This is the same thing we do for caseworking users who don’t have the
dashboard. Since we’re going to summarise scheduled jobs on the
dashboard instead of listing them they need to be listed here instead
(which is where we’ll link to from the dashboard).
Design of this will probably evolve as we work out how to style single
letter uploads and letter jobs, but that’s OK for now because no-one
has the uploads page at the moment.
Currently you have no way of getting to the returned letter page. This
commit adds a link to it from the dashboard, following the pattern of
the new received text messages banner.
This commit adds a new kind of banner to the dashboard for summarising
things you might need to action.
This way we’ll be able to have multiple instances of this banner on the
same page without it looking too intense.
I never really liked the big blue banner for inbound text messages
because it became the most prominent thing on the page. It was an
interim solution that let us ship the feature until we had something
better.
As per https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/170796514 we want to make the delete template confirmation dialog box more consistent and clear.
The API has been updated with a new endpoint that only returns the last-used date, this date is more accurate since it goes to the ft_notification_status table, if the notification table is empty.
I ended up creating a new test user and logged_in_client, which isn't really great. But I tried adding a current_session_id to the active user in the test, but that broke all other tests.
I tried setting current_session_id in all the users being tested but that didn't work either. I'd like to come back to fixing the tests and reducing the number of conftest methods in another PR. For now this fixes the bug.
make sure everything is using the `nl2br` formatter that properly wraps
it in markdown to keep everything sanitised nicely. Also write a couple
of tests
The API response for jobs includes a field called `job_status`. The API
response for uploads doesn’t.
The `Job` mode handles uploads and jobs, so it needs to account for the
possibility of the field not being there.
Jobs have a `scheduled_for` field. Single letter uploads don’t.
At the moment we treat both of them as `Job`s. So the `Job` model needs
to account for when the `scheduled_for` field is missing.
The property doesn’t represent the whole client, but just one method on
it. So this commit renames the property to better describe what it is
designed to store.
This follows the pattern of what we’ve done with services, users and
events.
It gives us a way of neatly instantiating a model for each item in the
list we get back from the API and reduces the complexity of the view
layer code.
Now is a good time to do this because we’re going to be making a bunch
of changes to the jobs pages, and those changes will be easier to code
and understand with a sensible model behind them.
os.environ is an `environ` object, not a dict. by only interacting with
it through builtin functions we can ensure it remains properly
accessible to third party libraries which might interact with it in
different ways.
See https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-api/commit/d2441466 for
more detail
We work out how complete a job’s processing is by looking at how many
notifications have been created.
Later, we deleted all the notifications, according to the data retention
schedule. This makes it look like the job has gone back to 0% processed.
This commit accounts for this by not showing the % complete message once
a finished job has had its notifications deleted.
Instead of using `mock_get_notification` to create a notification then
mock it in the tests, a new function, `create_notification`, can be used
to create a custom notification to be mocked. Using this in the
`test_notifications.py` file makes it Pytest 5 compatible.
This stops most instances of the fixtures which return sms senders,
email reply to addresses or letter contact blocks from being called as
if they were functions in the tests by replacing them with functions
which return the same results.
This change allows a couple of fixtures which are now longer used to be
deleted.
We were using user fixtures in a lot of parameterized tests, but this is
no longer allowed in Pytest 5. To avoid having to split up the parametrized
tests (which would make the test files a lot longer and slightly more
difficult to read) this commit creates functions which return various types
of user json so that we can use these as the test parameters instead.
Stopped fixtures in conftest.py from calling the fixtures which return
user json as if they were functions. Deleted two fixtures that are now no
longer needed as a result of the changes to conftest.py.
Users who have an API integration (and therefore have a way of passing
in a reference for each notification) can now search by that reference
(see https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-api/pull/2682)
This commit changes the label on the search box to tell these users that
this is possible, without changing the label for users without an API
integration, who might get confused by what ‘reference’ means.
It also makes the label consistently say ‘email address or phone number’
(ie email address is first) because this is our content style.
Flake8 Bugbear checks for some extra things that aren’t code style
errors, but are likely to introduce bugs or unexpected behaviour. A
good example is having mutable default function arguments, which get
shared between every call to the function and therefore mutating a value
in one place can unexpectedly cause it to change in another.
This commit enables all the extra warnings provided by Flake8 Bugbear,
except for the line length one (because we already lint for that
separately).
It disables:
- _B003: Assigning to os.environ_ because I don’t really understand this
- _B306: BaseException.message is removed in Python 3_ because I think
our exceptions have a custom structure that means the `.message`
attribute is still present
Events should be sorted reverse-chronologically, no matter what order
they come back from the API in, or which field in the API response
they’ve been extracted from.
This commit introduces a slightly hacky way of putting usernames against
events, given that the API only returns user IDs.
It does so without:
- making changes to the API
- making a pages that could potentially fire off dozens of API calls (ie
one per user)
This comes with the limitation that it can only get names for those team
members who are still in the team. Otherwise it will say ‘Unknown’.
In the future the API should probably return the name and email address
for the user who initiated the event, and whether that user was acting
in a platform admin capacity.
At the moment we have two types of event, ‘service’ events and ‘API key’
events. They are munged together which is useful initially, but could
get noisy.
This commit adds filters (copied from the choose template page) that let
users narrow down the list to one of the two types of event. This might
help users get a clearer picture of what’s going on.
Scanning the page is difficult at the moment because it’s hard to tell
how far apart in time events are, and thereby determine which events
might be related.
Grouping the events by day quickly lets users narrow their focus to
a meaningful subset of the events.
We store our audit history in two ways:
1. A list of versions of a service
2. A list of events to do with API keys
In the future there could be auditing data which we want to display that
is stored in other formats (for example the event table).
This commit adds some objects which wrap around the different types of
auditing data, and expose a consistent interface to them. This
architecture will let us:
- write clean code in the presentation layer to display these events on
a page
- add more types of events in the future by subclassing the `Event` data
type, without having to rewrite anything in the presentation layer
