We’ve moved from three to four permissions. Four permissions don’t fit
in the exiting horizontal layout.
This commit makes the permissions stack vertically instead.
This approach has some downsides:
- makes the permissions less easy to scan vertically
- makes them take up a lot more space (and at lives services, most of
them have somewhere around 15 team members)
But I think for now it’s better than any horizontal alternative that I
tried.
We’ve seen from research (a long time ago) that the ‘manage service’
permission is too broad, and gives too much control to someone who only
needs the ability to edit templates. In other words, editing content
should be its own, separate permission, rather than being rolled up
into manage service.
Since this is already disaggregated on the API side, making this change
just means changing the mapping on the admin side and adding an extra
checkbox on the invite/edit page. Which is what this commit does.
So for now, an existing user who has the manage service permission gets
both manage service and manage templates (ie no change to what they can
do). Newly invited users will get to choose if they have both, either,
or neither.
This commit makes sure that the right permission choices are shown in
these pages:
- manage team page
- invite a user page
- edit permissions page
This is in order to make changing these pages easier (see subsequent
commits).
This commit makes the existing tests around user permissions less
verbose by using the new `client_request` fixture.
This fixture takes care of:
- setting up a service
- asserting that the response is `200`
It also tests that the page titles, some of which didn’t match with the
`<h1>`s, so this commit also fixes that mismatch.
There are quite a few more options that there used to be in the settings
page. This means it’s hard to find the thing you want to change.
Grouping options is a common way of making things easier to find.
Grouping by channel (text, email, letter) is something we do elsewhere
that seems to work pretty well.
Two reasons to remove this:
1. It’s potentially confusing because you’ll see a preview of the first
message, but the first row might not appear in the table shown on
screen if it doesn’t have any errors.
2. If there are row-level errors in your file then they’re not related
to the template – it’s a distraction.
The send yourself a test flow doesn’t reference any kind of
file/rows/table in the front end any more, and doesn’t create a CSV in
the background (except for letters). And it should validate any mistakes
before getting to the check page.
So any user doing a send yourself a test flow should never get to this
template, which means we can remove some redundant code.
