We hardcode this as second class for the moment but eventually
will let the user pick.
Currently the API appears to do no validation, e.g. a json
schema, that rejects API calls with the extra key for postage.
Next steps will be to put a PR into the API that will expect a
postage value in the request and save it with the rest of the
notification. Then when that is done we can add the user interface
to the admin app to let the user pick the postage.
The ids are not needed for the first iteration of the Get started page, but we'll start using them as we add and iterate guidance and features content.
We should mention letter branding as a feature.
Otherwise you have a visible copy of the text underlapping the text in the textbox. Which, when they don’t quite align makes the text look bold. Seems to be more noticeable on some browsers/operating systems than others, but a bug all the same.
If there aren’t a range of options (normally presented as radio buttons)
to show the user on the email branding request page then we just show
the textbox. But we were still doing form validation on the radio
buttons, even though the user couldn’t see them to click them. This
stopped the user from being able to submit the form.
This commit fixes the problem by, in this specific case, pre-ticking the
‘Something else’ radio button.
We had been storing whether or not a file was valid in the S3 metadata,
but using the query string of the URL to store the original filename
and the page count. This meant that if you tried to view the preview
letter page without the query string you would see a `500`. It was
possible for this to happen if you were signed out of Notify while on
the preview page - you would be redirected back to the preview page but
without the query string, causing an error.
Add 'Printed' status for letters and update postage information
Discussed with @quis. This change is the first step towards a wider review of the letter statuses.
Removing the word ‘duplicate’ because:
- it suggests that the whole column is the same, which it might not be
- it suggests that having duplicate column names is a problem, which is
only true in the case of recipient columns
Reverts back to saying the column names ‘need to’ match, because we feel
it’s more instructive.
