If we want someone to read something (ie that they need to have the MOU
signed), then the best way is to make them interact with it.
And if someone doesn’t have the MOU in place, then we need to know to
send them a copy. The best way of them telling us this is in this form,
rather than sending them to the generic contact form and have them
compose a message saying ‘please send me the MOU thanks’, which we
haven’t seen anyone actually do.
We’ve had some non-helpful answers to these questions, eg ‘3’.
This commit adds examples of the kind of response we’re looking for, to
help users write good answers.
The mesaure on these pages was too short, making them awkward to read.
Also varies the size of text boxes to make them appropriate to the
expected size of content that they will contain.
This was an early reckon feature. There were a few of problems with
it:
- it worked on the service, not just on the API keys as described
- it was back to front, ‘suspending’ a service set `active` to `True`,
reactivating it set `active` to `False`
- no part of the API actually respected the `active` flag on a service
The same intent can be acheived by either:
- revoking an API key
- having a platform admin put your service back into trial mode
So this commit removes the link and the code behind it.
This commit:
- moves things around a bit on the request to go live page
- sticks a textbox in there
So when someone click the big green button, we will get a support ticket
that looks something like:
```
From Test User <test@user.gov.uk> on behalf of Test Service
(6ce466d0-fd6a-11e5-82f5-e0accb9d11a6)
---
We’ll send about 1000 text messages in the first month, and then 10,000
text messages per month after that. Usage of our service is about 50%
higher in March, at the end of the tax year.
```
This commit modifies the HTML `<title>` tags for all the pages. It makes two
main changes:
- make the title tag match the `<h1>` of the page, for better or worse
- put the service name after the page title, seperated by an en dash, as per
GOV.UK
This commit examines all the pages that use the page footer component, and
determines whether they should have a back button, a secondary link, both or
neither.
This macro:
- accepts a WTForm form field as a parameter
- renders a form field which follows the GOV.UK Elements patterns, both visually
and in markup terms
It then changes any page which uses either:
- the old, non-WTForms macro or
- the old, WTFforms `render_field` macro
…to use this new macro and removes both of the old ones.
It also adds the option to display hint text above the textbox.
Submit form was
- a confusing name in itself
- not descriptive, because it also has an optional ‘back’ link
This commit also puts this component in as many pages as possible, stripping
out any hard-coded buttons and links.
It replaces any usage of buttons for ‘back’, because these are links, not
buttons (ie they don’t change any data).
For pages where
- we want you to be sure that you want to do what you’re about to do
- we want to be sure it’s you trying to do the thing
This adds a page that asks the user to confirm their password.
Adds the pages and wires them together, so that it’s possible to click
through them.
The wording is not quite English, but attempts to be an rough description of
what the consequences are for each of the four actions.
