* Updated header and footer
* Updated fonts
* Moved files around and updated gulpfile to correct the build process when it goes to production
* Adjusted grid templating
* Added images to assets
* Update app/templates/components/uk_components/footer/template.njk
Co-authored-by: Steven Reilly <stvnrlly@users.noreply.github.com>
This replaces the slider with an integer input for each provider.
Unfortunately showing a variable number of inputs isn't easy to
achieve in WTForms [^1], but we think this is the least worst way
to do it vs e.g. not using WTForms at all.
[^1]: https://github.com/wtforms/wtforms/issues/736
Using "primary" made sense when the other "secondary" provider was
new, but today we see them as equivalent and the terminology is a
bit confusing. In future we may add a third provider as well.
When we converted textboxes on Notify to govuk-frontend design system
style with @tombye , we did not remove the imports.
This work is now done in this commit.
Some things that will still stay in our repo for now:
textbox macro in our components folder and associated css
textboxes which are really textarea fields (🤷 how do they work)
textboxes on the styleguide page
We should revisit this when we convert textarea fields
to govuk-frontend.
We chunk history entries by their YYYY-MM-DD date representation to
display them day-by-day.
However trying to convert a YYYY-MM-DD string into a timestamp is
unpredictable, and was causing our dates to be one day out (probably
because of midnight/daylight savings/general datetime horrors).
This commit changes the code to do the same thing as the history page,
which is look at the `updated_at` field on the first entry to get a
datetime object and from that the formatted date we show in the headings
on the page.
Makes these assumptions:
- we don’t care about history before 29th November 2019 at 11am (this
is when priority started to mean a proportion rather than a ranking)
- the priority of the second provider will always be the inverse of
the first provider
Which means the code is a lot simpler/actually does what you’d expect.
Their priority should always add up to 100%. Currently we have to ensure
this by hand. Adding this form means there’s no way to not set their
combined priorities to 100%. And it’s a bit more of an intuitive UI than
two textboxes on separate pages.
It’s not very useful to know the priority of one provider without
knowing the other. And these pages were never really designed, so they
weren’t super easy to understand anyway.
This commit adds a page that takes the first two text message providers
and shows their relative priority against each other.
It follows the design of the events page, as a pattern for showing a
log of historical events.
