This makes it easier to write a good message in the request to go live
submission. And encapsulating it in the `GovernmentDomain` class keeps
the view nice and clean.
When we process a go live request it’s a pain to have to go fishing in
the Google Drive to see if there’s a signed agreement in there. This
should make it easier when we know there’s already an agreement.
* Moved the notifications code to go to admin to get the the template
preview document rather than go to template preview.
This will remove the logic from admin and place it in api so it is
easier to expand on later when there are precompiled PDFs
* Added some error handling if API returns an API error.
Caught the error and displayed an error PNG so it is obvious something
failed. Currently it displayed a thumbnail of a png over the top of the
loading page, and therefore it wasn't obvious of the state.
Things in CSS stack top to bottom like this:
- image
- `box-shadow`
- `background`
We are drawing the border around the letter using `box-shadow`. This was
working fine because the images of our letters had a transparent
background, so you could see the border through them.
At some point our letters have changed to have a white background. So
you can no longer see the border.
This commit:
- adds a new pseudo element which stacks above the image of the letter
- moves the border from the image itself to said pseudo element
If a cell in the original file contains a comma, it comes back as two
cells in the downloaded file.
The CSV writer has logic to deal with this. It seems to work a lot
better that just concatenating the columns with commas ourselves.
For text messages/emails it makes sense for ‘sending’ to be gray and
‘delivered’ to be black. But since we don’t show sending/delivered for
letters it doesn’t make sense for the text to change colour.
view args are parameters within the route. for example,
`/organisation/<org_id>/users`. If there is an org_id, then check that
the user is part of that organisation (users.organisations is a list of
all orgs that user is a member of).
* platform admins ignore this check if restrict_admin_usage=False
* if an endpoint has both org_id and service_id, org_id takes
precedence, but we should probably revisit this if we ever need
to create such an endpoint.
* you now call `@user_has_permissions()` with no arguments for
organisation endpoints - we can look at this if we decide we want
more clarity.
* you should never call user_has_permissions without any arguments
for endpoints that aren't organisation-based. We'll raise
NotImplementedError if you do.
we branch on any_ to either say "require ALL these permissions" or
"require ANY of these permissions". But we only ever call the decorator
with one permission, or with any_=True, so it's unnecessary
rather than allow admins to do everything specifically, we should
only block them from things we conciously don't want them to do.
This is "Don't let platform admins send letters from services they're
not in". Everything else the platform admins can do.
This is step one, adding a restrict_admin_usage flag, and setting that
for those restricted endpoints around creating api keys, uploading CSVs
and sending one-off messages.
Also, this commit separates the two use cases for permissions:
* user.has_permission for access control
* user.has_permission_for_service for user info - this is used for
showing checkboxes on the manage-users page for example
With this, we can remove the admin_override flag from the permission
decorator.
in the db, we have several rows for single permissions - we separate
`send_messages` into `send_texts`, `send_emails` and `send_letters`,
and also `manage_service` into `manage_users` and `manage_settings`.
But on the front end we don't do anything with this distinction. It's
unhelpful for us to have to think about permissions as groups of things
when we can never split them up at all. So we should combine them. This
commit makes sure:
* when user models are read (from JSON direct from the API), we
should transform them from db permissions into roles.
* when permissions are persisted (editing permissions, and creating
invites), we should send db permissions to the API.
All other interaction with permissions (should just be the endpoint
decorator and checks in html templates generally) should use admin
roles.
when added to a service, all users are given the view_activity
permission. So, if that's included in the list, we don't need `any_`,
and we don't need any of the other permissions.
platform_admin is a separate concept to permissions, so by removing the
checks for it from the current_user.has_permissions function, we can
simplify things greatly. We already record on the user whether they're
a platform admin anyway.
