There’s a lot of code in service settings which:
- talks to the API directly through the clients
- passes that information through to the Jinja template
By encapsulating this logic in the service model:
- the Jinja template can access the data directly
- the logic can be reused across multiple methods
Making people use a property is a sure way to make sure they’re spelling
the name of the property correctly, and allows us to easily swap out
properties that call through to the underlying JSON, and properties
which are implemented as methods.
Most user will only have one reply to address. Which means they should
never have to worry about IDs. And if you only have one then you never
need its ID, because the last remaining address will always be the
default.
So IDs should only be shown when a service has created more than one
reply to address.
This required a bit of visual tweaking of the _user list_ pattern,
because its spacing wasn’t defined in a way that worked when only the
name of the thing, and not its details were shown on the page.
The first users of multiple email reply to addresses will be using the
API. This means that the need to be able to specify the ID of the reply
to address they want.
We chose to implement it like this instead of by passing the address in
directly because that means deploying code. For some teams deploying
code can take weeks, and we’d like to let teams have the flexibility to
make changes faster than this.
Same as for templates, you shouldn’t have to go to the _edit_ page in
order to get the ID. This means listing them on the page where you see
all the reply to addresses.
Listing the IDs like this means that it’s not really a table any more,
because the information isn’t organised in columns. So I think it makes
sense to reuse the pattern from the manage team page, which has a
similar relationship between the information.
