We have some teams who haver a series of files they have to send each
day. It’s easy to get muddled up and accidentally send the same file
again, if you think you haven’t already sent it.
This commit blocks you from sending the same combination of template
version and filename more than once on the same day[1].
This won’t affect teams who re-use the same template to give (for
example) updates on an incident for business continuity. These teams
edit the template between each send, thereby updating the version
number of the template.
1. This is based on how the `limit_days` argument to the API works - you
can dig into the code here: 2bd4f74ad0/app/dao/jobs_dao.py (L50)
In trial mode you can’t send letters. But it’s still useful to be able
to build up a letter to see how it work.
Best place to put this error is before someone tries to send a letter
for real.
Inheriting from `dict` has some unexpected side effects that don’t
happen with plain object. The one we want to avoid right now is that
a dict doesn’t seem to implement `__dict__` in a normal way, which
is required by `werkzeug.utils.cached_property`.
There was a lot of repetetive wrapping code being repeated for every
conditional block in these files. Let’s wrap it around the whole
conditional bit once instead.
they're currently expecting a RecipientsCSV object - but we won't
always have that available if we're handling a single notification.
So make the partials take generic variables, and then use a jinja with
block to pass in the correct values from either the check csv page or
the check notification page.
Additionally set the notification check page to show errors nicely -
hide the send button if there were problems, and replace the header
Implements https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-utils/pull/81
Handles addresses as multiple columns:
- in ‘Send yourself a test’
- in example CSV files
- in validating that a CSV file has recipients (eg at least an ‘address
line 1’ and ‘postcode’ column)
- when showing the contents of a CSV file
As few UI changes as possible, once we have the thing working end-to-end
we can think about how the UI might need to work differently.
branch for "has service sent anything today" was around the intial
paragraph, rather than around the "you can still send..." bit -
they should always see the first paragraph, especially the bit that
points out if they're in trial mode. They don't need to see how
many messages they have remaining today if it's the same amount as
their daily limit.
branch for "has service sent anything today" was around the intial
paragraph, rather than around the "you can still send..." bit -
they should always see the first paragraph, especially the bit that
points out if they're in trial mode. They don't need to see how
many messages they have remaining today if it's the same amount as
their daily limit.
