This commit adds:
- checkboxes to let you select a template or folder
- radio buttons to let you select where to move those template(s) and/or
folder(s) to
It only does the `get` part of this work; handling the `post` and
calling API will be done in a subsequent commit.
It’s not either text messages, or emails, or both now – it’s any
combination of the three channels.
This commit adds ‘letters’ as an option on the request to go live page
by changing the radio buttons to a group of checkboxes, so the user can
choose as many or as few as they want.
This commit also does a bunch of housekeeping stuff around the tests for
this page, because they haven’t been touched in quite some time.
Problems:
- WTForms expects the value of checkboxes to always be `y` (they don’t
work like radio buttons, which is where I copied this code for)
- WTForms `BooleanField`s don’t have a checked attribute, they set their
data attibute to `True` or `False`
The visual appearance of radio and checkbox form inputs changed in
GOV.UK Elements here:
https://github.com/alphagov/govuk_elements/pull/296
This was subsequently reimplemented with different markup and no
Javascript here:
https://github.com/alphagov/govuk_elements/pull/406
This has meant making the following changes to our app:
- changing the markup in our radio/checkbox macros to match the example
markup given by GOV.UK Elements
- removing the previous Javascript file because it’s no longer needed to
make the radios appear visual selected
- making the buttons on the scheduled job picker look like links,
because the grey button style looked weird with the new radio buttons
It’s invalid HTML to have multiple labels nested within each other. This
was happening by accident because WTForms tries to be clever – when you
put `{{ field.label }}` in a template it prints a `<label>` tag for you,
not just the text of the label. But we put our own `<label>` tags in the
HTML to have more control of them.
This commit stops WTForms being so clever.
The yes/no pattern didn’t work too well, because:
- it didn’t read naturally as a question and answer
- often users left them completely unclicked if they didn’t want to set
the permission (rather than clicking no)
This commit changes both the invite and edit user pages to use
checkboxes to set permissions. If also rewords these pages to read more
naturally, and explain what the permissions mean.
This meant changing some of the view logic around invites and
persmissions, and I ended up refactoring a bunch of it because I found
it hard to understand what was going on.
