One of the user needs that we identified is not wanting to be the first
to use it. It feels like a much less risky choice if there are already
other people in government using it.
The easiest way to communicate this is with counts of how many services.
The count of departments is good because it shows breadth, where the
count of services shows depth.
Hard coded for now because we have no automatic way of splitting our
test services from real live services.
‘How much does it cost’ is one of the user needs that we identifed for
the product page.
Cost is not the primary reason someone would use Notify (they’re more
likely to cite ease, or that it’s ‘official’). However if you _don’t_
mention cost then it looks like we’re hiding something or that there’s
a catch. So putting it on the page allays fears that people might have,
rather than pushing them towards using it.
Visually I’ve dropped the size of the `<h2>`s on this page so that
there’s enough difference between them and the big numbers. The idea of
the big numbers being big is to catch people’s attention as they scroll
down the page, by breaking up the rythmn.
This addresses part of the ‘is Notify dependable’ group of needs.
The ones it specifically and partially addresses are:
- is it reliable
- how is it supported
There’s more to come in this section, we’re doing this bit now because
it’s a nice conclusion to the page.
Also reword some of the `<p>`s so that they flow better from the
headings.
This was a bit me, and a bit sitting down and hammering this stuff out
with Stephen and Sheryll.
This is the first step towards a fully-fledged ‘product’ page.
The needs for the top, blue section of the page are:
- what is Notify?
- can I use it?
- can I test it out?
- how do I create a log in
The needs for the next section of this page (which is the only one added
by this commit) are:
- how will Notify help me work?
- will it work with my service?
This commit shows 4 features of Notify on the home page which address
those needs. They are illustrated because:
1. We want to catch people’s attention – users are reluctant to scroll
on this page because they just want to click the ‘create account
button’. But we hypothesize that they will get on better
with Notify if they look at some of this stuff first.
2. The concepts that they’re talking about are hard to explain with just
words because they’re quite abstract. The illustrations help us be
more specific.
3. Feedback we got from user research was that the product page didn’t
give users any sense of what it was like to actually use Notify.
This copies the style that Tim and Stephen have been developing for all
product pages.
It also pulls out the CSS for this into its own file, so that it could
potentially be reused.
This is part of the new header style that Tim, Stephen et al have been
working on.
This means that we lose the feedback link, so I’m trying out having it
in the top right.
This commit modifies the HTML `<title>` tags for all the pages. It makes two
main changes:
- make the title tag match the `<h1>` of the page, for better or worse
- put the service name after the page title, seperated by an en dash, as per
GOV.UK
Banners should always be the first thing on the page.
Because headers already have padding we don’t want to put padding on the
container.
So banners should also have top padding to distance then from the red bar.
They should also sit in the 3/4 column if the page has side navigation. This
commit adds a new template (`withoutnav_template.html`) which extends
`admin_template.html`. All views then extend one or the other, never the
`admin_template.html` directly. This means that `admin_template.html` doesn’t
have to make decisions about where the flash messages are displayed.
…or how to move a bunch of things from a bunch of different places into
`app/static`.
There are three main reasons not to use Flask Assets:
- It had some strange behaviour like only
- It was based on Ruby SASS, which is slower to get new features than libsass,
and meant depending on Ruby, and having the SASS Gem globally installed—so
you’re already out of being a ‘pure’ Python app
- Martyn and I have experience of doing it this way on Marketplace, and we’ve
ironed out the initial rough patches
The specific technologies this introduces, all of which are Node-based:
- Gulp – like a Makefile written in Javascript
- NPM – package management, used for managing Gulp and its related dependencies
- Bower – also package management, and the only way I can think to have
GOV.UK template as a proper dependency
…speaking of which, GOV.UK template is now a dependency. This means it can’t be
modified at all (eg to add a global `#content` wrapper), so every page now
inherits from a template that has this wrapper. But it also means that we have a
clean upgrade path when the template is modified.
Everything else (toolkit, elements) I’ve kept as submodules but moved them to a
more logical place (`app/assets` not `app/assets/stylesheets`, because they
contain more than just SASS/CSS).
