Includes:
- new content
- added option to turn analytics on/off
- non-js version for the on/off switch
- a banner to confirm user's choice was saved,
shown when they click the save button
- the cookie banner that appears on all other
pages removed from this page
Removes the following cookies:
- seen_cookie_message (flags if banner was already
shown)
- _gid (Google Analytics cookie)
- _ga (Google Analytics cookie)
These were set by default before so potentially
still around for some users.
The code for this now exists as a static method on
the cookieMessage module and is called when the JS
loads for the first time.
Copies HTML and Sass from GOV.UK Pubishing
components cookie-banner with changes to content
and functionality to better suit Notify.
Changes are:
- adds a 'reject' button which the GOV.UK
code doesn't have
- adds Sass from the GOV.UK Frontend button
component which the GOV.UK version used so
is included here
- removed click tracking from cookie banner
Notifications won’t exist for a job if:
- it’s just started
- it started a long time ago (older than the retention period)
We have a bug where:
1. Job starts processing, puts notifications on queue
2. Job finishes processing, sets status to `finished`
3. First notification gets picked up off the queue and put in the
database
In between 2. and 3. it’s possible for a job to be finished, but also to
have no notifications. We’re saying this is because the notifications
have been deleted, whereas really it’s because they haven’t been created
yet.
This commit fixes that bug by introducing the concept of recency for
jobs.
‘Recent’ is defined as 1 day, which is:
- a lot longer than it takes to create any notifications
- a bit shorter than anyone’s retention time
N.B. `processing_started` is defined here:
879ba1d5f0/app/models.py (L1194)
It can be `None` for scheduled jobs that haven’t started yet.
Jobs have a `scheduled_for` field. Single letter uploads don’t.
At the moment we treat both of them as `Job`s. So the `Job` model needs
to account for when the `scheduled_for` field is missing.
The property doesn’t represent the whole client, but just one method on
it. So this commit renames the property to better describe what it is
designed to store.
It returned the same value (and had the same code as
`.notifications_sent`).
I think `.notifications_sent` is a better name because it’s closer to
the language (‘sending’ and ‘sent’) that we use in the interface.
This way we have a URL we can give people that always points to the
latest version of the spec.
And it makes our code more Flask-idiomatic to be using `url_for` to be
generating a URL, rather than passing around a constant.
This test looks for how many times the string `50` appears in the text
of the `<main>` element of the page. The `<main>` element also contains
some times, for example 1:23pm.
This means that when the time reaches 1:50pm, 2:50pm, etc the number of
times the string `50` appears in the page changes. Which causes the test
assertions to fail.
It’s hard to read the tests when they have HTML bundled up with content.
So this commit:
- introduces BeautifulSoup to parse the HTML
- asserts separately on the text and any links found in the HTML
We show letter validation errors in two places:
1. In response to a user uploading a PDF
Here we use the error banner pattern because the problem is as a
direct consequence of a user’s action, and is blocking them from
continuing.
2. Once a PDF provided through the API has been validated
We use a less prominent pattern of red text with no border because
the message is reporting on something that’s already happened, and
which wasn’t a direct consequence of the user clicking something
Because the context and patterns used are different we need slightly
different content in each of these situations. Previously we tried to
reuse the same content to make the code cleaner and less repetitive. But
ultimately a clear interface trumps clear code.
This will make the diffs introducing substative changes easier to read.
Consistent indenting and always having trailing commas on lists and
dictionaries makes for smaller diffs.
app/assets/javascripts/errorTracking.js sent
events to `window.ga`.
This extends the API of `window.GOVUK.Analytics`
to include support for sending events so all
calls to `window.ga` can use it instead of direct
access.
This use of `window.ga` was missed from the
initial work on `window.GOVUK.Anaytics`.
Update list of organisations that can use Notify to remove 'housing associations' and rephrase 'companies owned by local or central government that deliver services on their behalf'.
The API clients should just deal with calling the API and returning the
data from it.
Inferring things from the data is more logically done at the model
layer. But we couldn’t do that before, because we didn’t have a model
layer for jobs.
By moving it from the view we reduce the complexity of the methods in
the view layer, so it’s easier to see what they do.
This also renames the variable `finished` to the property
`processing_finished` to disambiguate from the `job_status` field in the
JSON, which can also have a value of `finished`.
This follows the pattern of what we’ve done with services, users and
events.
It gives us a way of neatly instantiating a model for each item in the
list we get back from the API and reduces the complexity of the view
layer code.
Now is a good time to do this because we’re going to be making a bunch
of changes to the jobs pages, and those changes will be easier to code
and understand with a sensible model behind them.
This follows the pattern of what we’ve done with services, users and
events.
It gives us a better interface to the data we get back from the API than
dealing with the raw JSON directly.
Now is a good time to do this because we’re going to be making a bunch
of changes to the jobs pages, and those changes will be easier to code
and understand with a sesnsible model behind them.
The session key we use is global.
This means if you open the edit page for two different users in two
different tabs the session for the first tab is overwritten with the
session from the second tab. This means the two users are both set to
the same email address, which causes an exception (email addresses are
unique).
This commit fixes that bug by including the user ID in the session ID.
