Backend runtime upgraded to Python 3.14 with exact dependency pinning (#57)
Some checks failed
CICD Start / Sanity and Base Decision (push) Successful in 18s
Runner Canary / Canary Heavy (ubuntu-act-8gb) (push) Has been skipped
Runner Canary / Canary Heavy (ubuntu-act-4gb) (push) Has been skipped
Runner Canary / Canary Burst (ubuntu-act (push) Failing after 11m10s
Runner Canary / Canary (ubuntu-latest) (push) Failing after 12m39s
Runner Canary / Canary (ubuntu-act) (push) Failing after 12m42s
Some checks failed
CICD Start / Sanity and Base Decision (push) Successful in 18s
Runner Canary / Canary Heavy (ubuntu-act-8gb) (push) Has been skipped
Runner Canary / Canary Heavy (ubuntu-act-4gb) (push) Has been skipped
Runner Canary / Canary Burst (ubuntu-act (push) Failing after 11m10s
Runner Canary / Canary (ubuntu-latest) (push) Failing after 12m39s
Runner Canary / Canary (ubuntu-act) (push) Failing after 12m42s
Signed-off-by: Cliff Hill <xlorep@darkhelm.org> ## Summary Upgrades backend runtime baseline and dependency management for issue #10. ### Changes 1. **Python Baseline**: Updated from 3.13 to 3.14 - Updated `backend/pyproject.toml` requires-python constraint - Updated `backend/pyrightconfig.json` pythonVersion - Updated all Dockerfile and CI references 2. **Dependency Pinning**: Switched to exact version pins in `backend/pyproject.toml` - All dev and runtime dependencies now use `==` instead of `>=` - `fastapi==0.120.2`, `uvicorn==0.38.0` - ruff, pyright, pytest suite pinned to current resolved versions - Regenerated `backend/uv.lock` under Python 3.14 3. **Startup Compatibility Guard** (TDD via RED→GREEN) - New `compatibility_status()` function evaluates runtime and pinned deps - Startup raises `RuntimeError` if policy fails - Implemented via FastAPI lifespan (non-deprecated) handler 4. **Compatibility Status Endpoint** - New `GET /compatibility` returns policy status, runtime version, and package checks - Shares single source of truth with startup validation 5. **Integration Tests** - Added failing-then-passing tests for startup guard and endpoint behavior - 100% coverage maintained 6. **Direnv Configuration** - Added `UV_PYTHON="3.14"` pin to repo `.envrc` - Ensures direnv creates/recreates venv with correct Python version ### Validation - ✅ ruff format/check - ✅ pyright strict (0 errors) - ✅ pytest: 8 passed, 100% coverage (>=95 gate) - ✅ pydoclint: pass - ✅ xdoctest: pass ### Notes - SQLAlchemy/SQLModel introduction deferred to next pass per scope - Compatibility logic currently validates fastapi/uvicorn pins (runtime deps) - Ready for container build validation and Renovate bot testing Co-authored-by: copilotcoder <copilotcoder@darkhelm.org> Reviewed-on: #57 Co-authored-by: Cliff Hill <xlorep@darkhelm.org> Co-committed-by: Cliff Hill <xlorep@darkhelm.org>
This commit was merged in pull request #57.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -217,6 +217,31 @@ RUN echo "=== Base Image Optimization Status ===" && \
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting Playbook
|
||||
|
||||
### Missing Immutable Base Image
|
||||
|
||||
**Symptom**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
❌ Required immutable base image is not available: kankali.darkhelm.lan:3001/darkhelm.org/plex-playlist-cicd-base:<hash>
|
||||
Publish the base image via the CICD Base Image workflow before rerunning main CI.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Meaning**: The main CI workflow computed the expected base hash correctly, but the
|
||||
dedicated base-image workflow has not published that immutable tag yet.
|
||||
|
||||
**Checks**:
|
||||
1. Confirm whether `Dockerfile.cicd-base`, `.dockerignore`, or `scripts/compute-cicd-base-hash.sh` changed in the branch.
|
||||
2. Check the `CICD Base Image` workflow for the same commit or PR.
|
||||
3. Verify the registry contains `plex-playlist-cicd-base:<hash>`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Resolution**:
|
||||
1. If the base workflow is still running, rerun main CI after it completes.
|
||||
2. If the base workflow did not trigger, run it manually with `force_rebuild=false`.
|
||||
3. If the tag should be republished despite already existing, run it manually with `force_rebuild=true`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why CI does not self-heal here**: rebuilding the base inside the main workflow would
|
||||
make different runners produce and consume different local artifacts, which defeats the
|
||||
publish-once/consume-many design.
|
||||
|
||||
### Docker Build Failures
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. rsync Command Not Found
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user